Yes, I found your results, your first 'Star Trek: Renaissance' script up in the Web for anyone to endure. But how is that on topic for this forum?
I really do not know what is the appropriate forum where honesty about 'Star Trek: Renaissance' is appreciated, and even critical negative reviews of 'Star Trek: Renaissance' works are accepted graciously, and dealt with seriously and rationally.
<On the other hand, I haven't seen much of an activity in your Ship of Fools. What happened? Lack of interest, a failed approach, or what?>
The former, a lack of active interest. Perhaps you can help? Is that why you stopped by?
Because our goals are not the same, success comparison is difficult between 'Star Trek: Renaissance' and 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'. But if you really are determined to have a competition of some sort, then why not make it sporting? (Seeing as how flaming my invitations in various forums was AND STILL IS decidedly unsporting, and thus negates any sort of contest. DESIST!!!) Please feel free to send anyone my way, who was not happy with or did not work out with your studio rat race simulation, or, for whatever reason, drifted away from 'Star Trek: Renaissance'. I would be most appreciative, and I would do my best to develop with them a more compatible alternative, in 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'.
Still, you still pursue your so called challenge, from unfair advantage to begin with. But I have now repeated my counter challenge for a real test of 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools' (having long conceded your numerical superiority at recruitment).
While 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools' remains untested, 'Star Trek: Renaissance' might still conceivably be the failed approach, depending, of course, upon it's goals. However, your goals, and particularly the values by which said goals are informed, are not clear to me. Nor would they be obvious, as they are certainly not universal. But, again, I really do not know what is the appropriate forum where such questions are dealt with civilly, seriously and rationally, regarding 'Star Trek: Renaissance'.
As I understand it, I don't think one would see activity on your project either, since such is not conducted out in the open. Public bulletin board discussion irregardless. On the web, only some end product appears, for 'Star Trek: Renaissance'.
As far as that goes, I, too, have been revising and expanding my site, 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'.
Brainstorming, of course, is hardly a failed approach, neither historically nor currently. But browse my FAQ and selected links on the subject for yourself, if you are interested.
Since you mention it, there is a place and a needful application for discipline, too, of course; indeed, where such may often be found sorely wanting. And that question is also treated in a related FAQ.
This forum is for pertinent feedback to and willing participation in 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'. And I welcome any such that you may have to offer.
[Now, let's see if he even follows up, after posting as an Unregistered User! A sly tactic which assures that no one will discover this forum by tracking Wizdoc's ezboard posts.]
I really do not know what is the appropriate forum where honesty about 'Star Trek: Renaissance' is appreciated, and even critical negative reviews of 'Star Trek: Renaissance' works are accepted graciously, and dealt with seriously and rationally.
<On the other hand, I haven't seen much of an activity in your Ship of Fools. What happened? Lack of interest, a failed approach, or what?>
The former, a lack of active interest. Perhaps you can help? Is that why you stopped by?
Because our goals are not the same, success comparison is difficult between 'Star Trek: Renaissance' and 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'. But if you really are determined to have a competition of some sort, then why not make it sporting? (Seeing as how flaming my invitations in various forums was AND STILL IS decidedly unsporting, and thus negates any sort of contest. DESIST!!!) Please feel free to send anyone my way, who was not happy with or did not work out with your studio rat race simulation, or, for whatever reason, drifted away from 'Star Trek: Renaissance'. I would be most appreciative, and I would do my best to develop with them a more compatible alternative, in 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'.
Still, you still pursue your so called challenge, from unfair advantage to begin with. But I have now repeated my counter challenge for a real test of 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools' (having long conceded your numerical superiority at recruitment).
While 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools' remains untested, 'Star Trek: Renaissance' might still conceivably be the failed approach, depending, of course, upon it's goals. However, your goals, and particularly the values by which said goals are informed, are not clear to me. Nor would they be obvious, as they are certainly not universal. But, again, I really do not know what is the appropriate forum where such questions are dealt with civilly, seriously and rationally, regarding 'Star Trek: Renaissance'.
As I understand it, I don't think one would see activity on your project either, since such is not conducted out in the open. Public bulletin board discussion irregardless. On the web, only some end product appears, for 'Star Trek: Renaissance'.
As far as that goes, I, too, have been revising and expanding my site, 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'.
Brainstorming, of course, is hardly a failed approach, neither historically nor currently. But browse my FAQ and selected links on the subject for yourself, if you are interested.
Since you mention it, there is a place and a needful application for discipline, too, of course; indeed, where such may often be found sorely wanting. And that question is also treated in a related FAQ.
This forum is for pertinent feedback to and willing participation in 'Star Trek: The Ship of Fools'. And I welcome any such that you may have to offer.
[Now, let's see if he even follows up, after posting as an Unregistered User! A sly tactic which assures that no one will discover this forum by tracking Wizdoc's ezboard posts.]
